Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Community Health Needs Assessment Survey

The 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment survey was conducted by Professional Research Consultants, Inc. (PRC). There were 1,084 participants in the survey (adults aged 18 years and older), which was conducted via both landline and cell phone interviews in English and Spanish. The survey results were adjusted to match the geographic distribution and demographic characteristics of the population surveyed, as determined by the 2010 U.S. Census. Geographic areas for respondent data are based on only the Kane County portion of ZIP codes within the Kane County planning areas.
 
The survey was largely based on the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in addition to other public health surveys and other customized questions agreed upon by PRC and sponsoring community partners.
 
The 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment survey was part of a larger project conducted via collaboration of multiple community partners in Kane County, including: 708 INC Board, Advocate Sherman Hospital, Northwestern Delnor Hospital, Kane County Health Department, Presence Mercy Medical Center, Presence Saint Joseph Hospital, and Rush-Copley Medical Center.
 
Additional information regarding this survey, and other health assessments conducted in Kane County, may be found at the Community Health Needs Assessment 2014 Comprehensive Website.

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Binge Drinker

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Binge Drinker

Value
Compared to:

Binge Drinker County: Kane

Current Value:

Binge Drinker County: Kane

26.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (19.9%), Kane has a value of 26.5% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(19.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (20.0%), Kane has a value of 26.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (26.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.2%).
Prior Value
(16.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Binge Drinker Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Binge Drinker Planning Area: Central

23.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (20.0%), Central has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (23.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (15.8%).
Prior Value
(15.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Binge Drinker Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Binge Drinker Planning Area: North

27.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (20.0%), North has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (27.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (18.6%).
Prior Value
(18.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Binge Drinker Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Binge Drinker Planning Area: South

26.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (20.0%), South has a value of 26.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (26.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.7%).
Prior Value
(13.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Chronic Drinker

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Chronic Drinker

Value
Compared to:

Chronic Drinker County: Kane

Current Value:

Chronic Drinker County: Kane

3.7%
(2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.2%), Kane has a value of 3.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.2%)
The U.S. value is taken from the 2013 PRC National Health Survey; the methodological approach for the national survey is identical to the approach for the 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment in Kane County.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Chronic Drinker Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Chronic Drinker Planning Area: Central

5.4%
(2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.2%), Central has a value of 5.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.2%)
The U.S. value is taken from the 2013 PRC National Health Survey; the methodological approach for the national survey is identical to the approach for the 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment in Kane County.

Chronic Drinker Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Chronic Drinker Planning Area: North

3.5%
(2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.2%), North has a value of 3.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.2%)
The U.S. value is taken from the 2013 PRC National Health Survey; the methodological approach for the national survey is identical to the approach for the 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment in Kane County.

Chronic Drinker Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Chronic Drinker Planning Area: South

3.1%
(2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.2%), South has a value of 3.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.2%)
The U.S. value is taken from the 2013 PRC National Health Survey; the methodological approach for the national survey is identical to the approach for the 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment in Kane County.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Current Drinker

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Current Drinker

Value
Compared to:

Current Drinker County: Kane

Current Value:

Current Drinker County: Kane

65.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (56.5%), Kane has a value of 65.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(56.5% in 2014)
The U.S. value is taken from the 2013 PRC National Health Survey; the methodological approach for the national survey is identical to the approach for the 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment in Kane County.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (65.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (61.9%).
Prior Value
(61.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Current Drinker Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Current Drinker Planning Area: Central

67.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (56.5%), Central has a value of 67.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(56.5% in 2014)
The U.S. value is taken from the 2013 PRC National Health Survey; the methodological approach for the national survey is identical to the approach for the 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment in Kane County.
Compared to the prior value, Central (67.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (69.7%).
Prior Value
(69.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Current Drinker Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Current Drinker Planning Area: North

64.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (56.5%), North has a value of 64.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(56.5% in 2014)
The U.S. value is taken from the 2013 PRC National Health Survey; the methodological approach for the national survey is identical to the approach for the 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment in Kane County.
Compared to the prior value, North (64.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (67.6%).
Prior Value
(67.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Current Drinker Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Current Drinker Planning Area: South

64.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (56.5%), South has a value of 64.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(56.5% in 2014)
The U.S. value is taken from the 2013 PRC National Health Survey; the methodological approach for the national survey is identical to the approach for the 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment in Kane County.
Compared to the prior value, South (64.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (52.3%).
Prior Value
(52.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Drinking and Driving in the Past Month

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Drinking and Driving in the Past Month

Value
Compared to:

Drinking and Driving in the Past Month County: Kane

Current Value:

Drinking and Driving in the Past Month County: Kane

7.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (3.8%), Kane has a value of 7.8% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.2%), Kane has a value of 7.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (7.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.4%).
Prior Value
(1.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Drinking and Driving in the Past Month Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Drinking and Driving in the Past Month Planning Area: Central

4.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.2%), Central has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (4.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.0%).
Prior Value
(1.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Drinking and Driving in the Past Month Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Drinking and Driving in the Past Month Planning Area: North

8.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.2%), North has a value of 8.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (8.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.8%).
Prior Value
(1.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Drinking and Driving in the Past Month Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Drinking and Driving in the Past Month Planning Area: South

8.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.2%), South has a value of 8.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (8.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.0%).
Prior Value
(1.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Colorectal Cancer Screening (Age 50-75)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Colorectal Cancer Screening (Age 50-75)

Value
Compared to:

Colorectal Cancer Screening (Age 50-75) County: Kane

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Screening (Age 50-75) County: Kane

75.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (63.5%), Kane has a value of 75.1% which is higher and better.
IL Value
(63.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (76.4%), Kane has a value of 75.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (75.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (73.0%).
Prior Value
(73.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Colorectal Cancer Screening (Age 50-75) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Screening (Age 50-75) Planning Area: Central

72.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (76.4%), Central has a value of 72.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (72.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (63.2%).
Prior Value
(63.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Colorectal Cancer Screening (Age 50-75) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Screening (Age 50-75) Planning Area: North

77.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (76.4%), North has a value of 77.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(76.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (77.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (74.0%).
Prior Value
(74.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Colorectal Cancer Screening (Age 50-75) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Screening (Age 50-75) Planning Area: South

74.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (76.4%), South has a value of 74.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (74.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (76.1%).
Prior Value
(76.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Cancer

Pap Smear in Past 3 Years (Women ages 21-65)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Pap Smear in Past 3 Years (Women ages 21-65)

Value
Compared to:

Pap Smear in Past 3 Years (Women ages 21-65) County: Kane

Current Value:

Pap Smear in Past 3 Years (Women ages 21-65) County: Kane

79.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (83.8%), Kane has a value of 79.6% which is lower and worse.
IL Value
(83.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (73.5%), Kane has a value of 79.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(73.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (79.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (85.7%).
Prior Value
(85.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Pap Smear in Past 3 Years (Women ages 21-65) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Pap Smear in Past 3 Years (Women ages 21-65) Planning Area: Central

81.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (73.5%), Central has a value of 81.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(73.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (81.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (83.2%).
Prior Value
(83.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Pap Smear in Past 3 Years (Women ages 21-65) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Pap Smear in Past 3 Years (Women ages 21-65) Planning Area: North

82.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (73.5%), North has a value of 82.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(73.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (82.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (85.9%).
Prior Value
(85.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Pap Smear in Past 3 Years (Women ages 21-65) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Pap Smear in Past 3 Years (Women ages 21-65) Planning Area: South

76.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (73.5%), South has a value of 76.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(73.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (76.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (86.3%).
Prior Value
(86.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Cancer

PSA Test in Past 2 Years (Men ages 40+)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

PSA Test in Past 2 Years (Men ages 40+)

Value
Compared to:

PSA Test in Past 2 Years (Men ages 40+) County: Kane

Current Value:

PSA Test in Past 2 Years (Men ages 40+) County: Kane

54.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (55.0%), Kane has a value of 54.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(55.0% in 2014)
The U.S. value is taken from the 2013 PRC National Health Survey; the methodological approach for the national survey is identical to the approach for the 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment in Kane County.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (54.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (59.6%).
Prior Value
(59.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

PSA Test in Past 2 Years (Men ages 40+) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

PSA Test in Past 2 Years (Men ages 40+) Planning Area: Central

57.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (55.0%), Central has a value of 57.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(55.0% in 2014)
The U.S. value is taken from the 2013 PRC National Health Survey; the methodological approach for the national survey is identical to the approach for the 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment in Kane County.
Compared to the prior value, Central (57.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (59.1%).
Prior Value
(59.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

PSA Test in Past 2 Years (Men ages 40+) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

PSA Test in Past 2 Years (Men ages 40+) Planning Area: North

60.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (55.0%), North has a value of 60.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(55.0% in 2014)
The U.S. value is taken from the 2013 PRC National Health Survey; the methodological approach for the national survey is identical to the approach for the 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment in Kane County.
Compared to the prior value, North (60.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (60.9%).
Prior Value
(60.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

PSA Test in Past 2 Years (Men ages 40+) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

PSA Test in Past 2 Years (Men ages 40+) Planning Area: South

48.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (55.0%), South has a value of 48.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(55.0% in 2014)
The U.S. value is taken from the 2013 PRC National Health Survey; the methodological approach for the national survey is identical to the approach for the 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment in Kane County.
Compared to the prior value, South (48.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (58.0%).
Prior Value
(58.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Children's Health

Health / Children's Health

Health / Children's Health

Children Healthy Weight (Ages 5-17)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Children's Health

Children Healthy Weight (Ages 5-17)

Value
Compared to:

Children Healthy Weight (Ages 5-17) County: Kane

Current Value:

Children Healthy Weight (Ages 5-17) County: Kane

52.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (58.4%), Kane has a value of 52.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(58.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (52.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (62.7%).
Prior Value
(62.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children Healthy Weight (Ages 5-17) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Children Healthy Weight (Ages 5-17) Planning Area: Central

68.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (58.4%), Central has a value of 68.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (68.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (65.3%).
Prior Value
(65.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children Healthy Weight (Ages 5-17) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Children Healthy Weight (Ages 5-17) Planning Area: North

48.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (58.4%), North has a value of 48.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(58.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (48.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (62.2%).
Prior Value
(62.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children Healthy Weight (Ages 5-17) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Children Healthy Weight (Ages 5-17) Planning Area: South

50.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (58.4%), South has a value of 50.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(58.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (50.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (62.2%).
Prior Value
(62.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Children's Health

Children Obese (Ages 5-17) (95th Percentile)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Children's Health

Children Obese (Ages 5-17) (95th Percentile)

Value
Compared to:

Children Obese (Ages 5-17) (95th Percentile) County: Kane

Current Value:

Children Obese (Ages 5-17) (95th Percentile) County: Kane

24.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (20.4%), Kane has a value of 24.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(20.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (24.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.3%).
Prior Value
(16.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children Obese (Ages 5-17) (95th Percentile) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Children Obese (Ages 5-17) (95th Percentile) Planning Area: Central

11.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (20.4%), Central has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(20.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (11.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.5%).
Prior Value
(13.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children Obese (Ages 5-17) (95th Percentile) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Children Obese (Ages 5-17) (95th Percentile) Planning Area: North

24.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (20.4%), North has a value of 24.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(20.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (24.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children Obese (Ages 5-17) (95th Percentile) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Children Obese (Ages 5-17) (95th Percentile) Planning Area: South

29.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (20.4%), South has a value of 29.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(20.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (29.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (22.7%).
Prior Value
(22.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Children's Health

Children Overweight (Ages 5-17) (85th Percentile)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Children's Health

Children Overweight (Ages 5-17) (85th Percentile)

Value
Compared to:

Children Overweight (Ages 5-17) (85th Percentile) County: Kane

Current Value:

Children Overweight (Ages 5-17) (85th Percentile) County: Kane

36.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Kane has a value of 36.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (36.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (27.6%).
Prior Value
(27.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children Overweight (Ages 5-17) (85th Percentile) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Children Overweight (Ages 5-17) (85th Percentile) Planning Area: Central

13.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Central has a value of 13.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (13.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (21.6%).
Prior Value
(21.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children Overweight (Ages 5-17) (85th Percentile) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Children Overweight (Ages 5-17) (85th Percentile) Planning Area: North

41.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), North has a value of 41.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (41.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (25.5%).
Prior Value
(25.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children Overweight (Ages 5-17) (85th Percentile) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Children Overweight (Ages 5-17) (85th Percentile) Planning Area: South

41.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), South has a value of 41.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (41.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (32.9%).
Prior Value
(32.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Children's Health

Currently Has Asthma (Children Ages 2-17)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Children's Health

Currently Has Asthma (Children Ages 2-17)

Value
Compared to:

Currently Has Asthma (Children Ages 2-17) County: Kane

Current Value:

Currently Has Asthma (Children Ages 2-17) County: Kane

4.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.1%), Kane has a value of 4.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (4.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.3%).
Prior Value
(8.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Currently Has Asthma (Children Ages 2-17) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Currently Has Asthma (Children Ages 2-17) Planning Area: Central

3.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.1%), Central has a value of 3.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (3.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.5%).
Prior Value
(10.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Currently Has Asthma (Children Ages 2-17) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Currently Has Asthma (Children Ages 2-17) Planning Area: North

5.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.1%), North has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (5.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.2%).
Prior Value
(11.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Currently Has Asthma (Children Ages 2-17) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Currently Has Asthma (Children Ages 2-17) Planning Area: South

3.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.1%), South has a value of 3.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (3.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.3%).
Prior Value
(4.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Children's Health

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 2-17)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Children's Health

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 2-17)

Value
Compared to:

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 2-17) County: Kane

Current Value:

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 2-17) County: Kane

85.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (87.0%), Kane has a value of 85.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(87.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (85.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (91.9%).
Prior Value
(91.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 2-17) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 2-17) Planning Area: Central

94.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (87.0%), Central has a value of 94.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(87.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (94.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (95.6%).
Prior Value
(95.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 2-17) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 2-17) Planning Area: North

88.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (87.0%), North has a value of 88.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(87.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (88.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (91.0%).
Prior Value
(91.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 2-17) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 2-17) Planning Area: South

80.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (87.0%), South has a value of 80.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(87.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (80.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (91.4%).
Prior Value
(91.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Borderline/Pre-Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Borderline/Pre-Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Borderline/Pre-Diabetes County: Kane

Current Value:

Borderline/Pre-Diabetes County: Kane

7.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (1.0%), Kane has a value of 7.5% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.5%), Kane has a value of 7.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (7.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Borderline/Pre-Diabetes Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Borderline/Pre-Diabetes Planning Area: Central

4.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (9.5%), Central has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (4.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.7%).
Prior Value
(4.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Borderline/Pre-Diabetes Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Borderline/Pre-Diabetes Planning Area: North

9.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (9.5%), North has a value of 9.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (9.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Borderline/Pre-Diabetes Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Borderline/Pre-Diabetes Planning Area: South

6.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (9.5%), South has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (6.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Diabetes

Diabetes/High Blood Sugar

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Diabetes/High Blood Sugar

Value
Compared to:

Diabetes/High Blood Sugar County: Kane

Current Value:

Diabetes/High Blood Sugar County: Kane

11.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (10.4%), Kane has a value of 11.1% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.3%), Kane has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (11.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.4%).
Prior Value
(9.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Diabetes/High Blood Sugar Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Diabetes/High Blood Sugar Planning Area: Central

10.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.3%), Central has a value of 10.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (10.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.9%).
Prior Value
(6.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Diabetes/High Blood Sugar Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Diabetes/High Blood Sugar Planning Area: North

12.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.3%), North has a value of 12.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (12.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.4%).
Prior Value
(6.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Diabetes/High Blood Sugar Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Diabetes/High Blood Sugar Planning Area: South

10.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.3%), South has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (10.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.9%).
Prior Value
(13.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Eye Exam in the Past Two Years

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Eye Exam in the Past Two Years

Value
Compared to:

Eye Exam in the Past Two Years County: Kane

Current Value:

Eye Exam in the Past Two Years County: Kane

58.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (55.3%), Kane has a value of 58.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (58.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (56.2%).
Prior Value
(56.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Eye Exam in the Past Two Years Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Eye Exam in the Past Two Years Planning Area: Central

63.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (55.3%), Central has a value of 63.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (63.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (61.8%).
Prior Value
(61.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Eye Exam in the Past Two Years Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Eye Exam in the Past Two Years Planning Area: North

55.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (55.3%), North has a value of 55.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (55.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (57.6%).
Prior Value
(57.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Eye Exam in the Past Two Years Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Eye Exam in the Past Two Years Planning Area: South

59.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (55.3%), South has a value of 59.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (59.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (52.3%).
Prior Value
(52.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Ever Told Have High Blood Pressure (HBP)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Ever Told Have High Blood Pressure (HBP)

Value
Compared to:

Ever Told Have High Blood Pressure (HBP) County: Kane

Current Value:

Ever Told Have High Blood Pressure (HBP) County: Kane

32.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (30.8%), Kane has a value of 32.3% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(30.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (37.0%), Kane has a value of 32.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (32.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (32.2%).
Prior Value
(32.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Ever Told Have High Blood Pressure (HBP) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Ever Told Have High Blood Pressure (HBP) Planning Area: Central

30.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (37.0%), Central has a value of 30.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (30.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (33.6%).
Prior Value
(33.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Ever Told Have High Blood Pressure (HBP) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Ever Told Have High Blood Pressure (HBP) Planning Area: North

34.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (37.0%), North has a value of 34.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (34.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.6%).
Prior Value
(28.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Ever Told Have High Blood Pressure (HBP) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Ever Told Have High Blood Pressure (HBP) Planning Area: South

30.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (37.0%), South has a value of 30.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (30.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (36.0%).
Prior Value
(36.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Ever told Have High Cholesterol (HBC)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Ever told Have High Cholesterol (HBC)

Value
Compared to:

Ever told Have High Cholesterol (HBC) County: Kane

Current Value:

Ever told Have High Cholesterol (HBC) County: Kane

29.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (36.2%), Kane has a value of 29.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (29.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (32.6%).
Prior Value
(32.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Ever told Have High Cholesterol (HBC) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Ever told Have High Cholesterol (HBC) Planning Area: Central

31.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (36.2%), Central has a value of 31.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (31.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (30.3%).
Prior Value
(30.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Ever told Have High Cholesterol (HBC) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Ever told Have High Cholesterol (HBC) Planning Area: North

29.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (36.2%), North has a value of 29.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (29.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (35.4%).
Prior Value
(35.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Ever told Have High Cholesterol (HBC) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Ever told Have High Cholesterol (HBC) Planning Area: South

28.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (36.2%), South has a value of 28.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (28.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (30.3%).
Prior Value
(30.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Heart Disease (Heart Attack, Angina, Coronary Disease)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Heart Disease (Heart Attack, Angina, Coronary Disease)

Value
Compared to:

Heart Disease (Heart Attack, Angina, Coronary Disease) County: Kane

Current Value:

Heart Disease (Heart Attack, Angina, Coronary Disease) County: Kane

4.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Kane has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (4.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.9%).
Prior Value
(5.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Heart Disease (Heart Attack, Angina, Coronary Disease) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Heart Disease (Heart Attack, Angina, Coronary Disease) Planning Area: Central

4.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Central has a value of 4.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (4.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.2%).
Prior Value
(4.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Heart Disease (Heart Attack, Angina, Coronary Disease) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Heart Disease (Heart Attack, Angina, Coronary Disease) Planning Area: North

5.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), North has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (5.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.6%).
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Heart Disease (Heart Attack, Angina, Coronary Disease) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Heart Disease (Heart Attack, Angina, Coronary Disease) Planning Area: South

3.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), South has a value of 3.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (3.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.7%).
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Stroke County: Kane

Current Value:

Stroke County: Kane

1.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (3.1%), Kane has a value of 1.8% which is lower and better.
IL Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.7%), Kane has a value of 1.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (1.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.7%).
Prior Value
(1.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Stroke Planning Area: Central

Current Value:
1.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.7%), Central has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (1.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.4%).
Prior Value
(1.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Stroke Planning Area: North

Current Value:
3.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.7%), North has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (3.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.3%).
Prior Value
(1.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Stroke Planning Area: South

Current Value:
0.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.7%), South has a value of 0.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (0.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.4%).
Prior Value
(2.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (Ages 65+)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (Ages 65+)

Value
Compared to:

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (Ages 65+) County: Kane

Current Value:

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (Ages 65+) County: Kane

75.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (56.4%), Kane has a value of 75.8% which is higher and better.
IL Value
(56.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (76.8%), Kane has a value of 75.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (75.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (55.0%).
Prior Value
(55.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (Ages 65+) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (Ages 65+) Planning Area: Central

75.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (76.8%), Central has a value of 75.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (75.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (48.7%).
Prior Value
(48.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (Ages 65+) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (Ages 65+) Planning Area: North

75.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (76.8%), North has a value of 75.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (75.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (54.8%).
Prior Value
(54.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (Ages 65+) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (Ages 65+) Planning Area: South

76.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (76.8%), South has a value of 76.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (76.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (58.7%).
Prior Value
(58.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (High Risk Ages 18-64)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (High Risk Ages 18-64)

Value
Compared to:

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (High Risk Ages 18-64) County: Kane

Current Value:

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (High Risk Ages 18-64) County: Kane

52.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (55.7%), Kane has a value of 52.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(55.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (52.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (36.7%).
Prior Value
(36.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (High Risk Ages 18-64) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (High Risk Ages 18-64) Planning Area: Central

62.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (55.7%), Central has a value of 62.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(55.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (62.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (39.1%).
Prior Value
(39.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (High Risk Ages 18-64) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (High Risk Ages 18-64) Planning Area: North

44.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (55.7%), North has a value of 44.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(55.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (44.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (28.4%).
Prior Value
(28.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (High Risk Ages 18-64) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Flu Vaccine in the Past Year (High Risk Ages 18-64) Planning Area: South

56.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (55.7%), South has a value of 56.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(55.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (56.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (44.6%).
Prior Value
(44.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

HIV Test in the Past Year (Age 18-44)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

HIV Test in the Past Year (Age 18-44)

Value
Compared to:

HIV Test in the Past Year (Age 18-44) County: Kane

Current Value:

HIV Test in the Past Year (Age 18-44) County: Kane

19.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (24.7%), Kane has a value of 19.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (19.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (19.1%).
Prior Value
(19.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

HIV Test in the Past Year (Age 18-44) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

HIV Test in the Past Year (Age 18-44) Planning Area: Central

20.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (24.7%), Central has a value of 20.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (20.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (18.6%).
Prior Value
(18.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

HIV Test in the Past Year (Age 18-44) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

HIV Test in the Past Year (Age 18-44) Planning Area: North

13.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (24.7%), North has a value of 13.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (13.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (17.9%).
Prior Value
(17.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

HIV Test in the Past Year (Age 18-44) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

HIV Test in the Past Year (Age 18-44) Planning Area: South

25.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (24.7%), South has a value of 25.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (25.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (20.4%).
Prior Value
(20.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (Ages 65+)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (Ages 65+)

Value
Compared to:

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (Ages 65+) County: Kane

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (Ages 65+) County: Kane

79.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (69.6%), Kane has a value of 79.0% which is higher and better.
IL Value
(69.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (82.7%), Kane has a value of 79.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (79.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (71.0%).
Prior Value
(71.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (Ages 65+) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (Ages 65+) Planning Area: Central

79.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (82.7%), Central has a value of 79.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (79.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (69.4%).
Prior Value
(69.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (Ages 65+) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (Ages 65+) Planning Area: North

75.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (82.7%), North has a value of 75.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (75.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (71.7%).
Prior Value
(71.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (Ages 65+) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (Ages 65+) Planning Area: South

82.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (82.7%), South has a value of 82.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (82.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (70.6%).
Prior Value
(70.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (High Risk Ages 18-64)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (High Risk Ages 18-64)

Value
Compared to:

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (High Risk Ages 18-64) County: Kane

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (High Risk Ages 18-64) County: Kane

32.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (39.9%), Kane has a value of 32.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(39.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (32.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (32.5%).
Prior Value
(32.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (High Risk Ages 18-64) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (High Risk Ages 18-64) Planning Area: Central

38.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (39.9%), Central has a value of 38.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(39.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (38.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (25.9%).
Prior Value
(25.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (High Risk Ages 18-64) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (High Risk Ages 18-64) Planning Area: North

38.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (39.9%), North has a value of 38.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(39.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (38.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (38.7%).
Prior Value
(38.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (High Risk Ages 18-64) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccine Ever (High Risk Ages 18-64) Planning Area: South

24.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (39.9%), South has a value of 24.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(39.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (24.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (28.2%).
Prior Value
(28.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

"Fair/Poor" Mental Health

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

"Fair/Poor" Mental Health

Value
Compared to:

"Fair/Poor" Mental Health County: Kane

Current Value:

"Fair/Poor" Mental Health County: Kane

17.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.0%), Kane has a value of 17.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (17.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.5%).
Prior Value
(10.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

"Fair/Poor" Mental Health Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

"Fair/Poor" Mental Health Planning Area: Central

13.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.0%), Central has a value of 13.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (13.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.1%).
Prior Value
(6.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

"Fair/Poor" Mental Health Planning Area: North

Current Value:

"Fair/Poor" Mental Health Planning Area: North

18.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.0%), North has a value of 18.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (18.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.6%).
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

"Fair/Poor" Mental Health Planning Area: South

Current Value:

"Fair/Poor" Mental Health Planning Area: South

18.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.0%), South has a value of 18.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (18.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.8%).
Prior Value
(16.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Diagnosed Depression

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Diagnosed Depression

Value
Compared to:

Diagnosed Depression County: Kane

Current Value:

Diagnosed Depression County: Kane

21.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (16.5%), Kane has a value of 21.0% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.6%), Kane has a value of 21.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (21.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.8%).
Prior Value
(11.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Diagnosed Depression Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Diagnosed Depression Planning Area: Central

22.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (21.6%), Central has a value of 22.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (22.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.1%).
Prior Value
(8.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Diagnosed Depression Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Diagnosed Depression Planning Area: North

19.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (21.6%), North has a value of 19.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (19.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Diagnosed Depression Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Diagnosed Depression Planning Area: South

21.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (21.6%), South has a value of 21.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (21.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 18+)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Oral Health

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 18+)

Value
Compared to:

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 18+) County: Kane

Current Value:

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 18+) County: Kane

72.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (65.5%), Kane has a value of 72.1% which is higher and better.
IL Value
(65.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (59.7%), Kane has a value of 72.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(59.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (72.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (71.6%).
Prior Value
(71.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 18+) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 18+) Planning Area: Central

80.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (59.7%), Central has a value of 80.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(59.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (80.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (82.9%).
Prior Value
(82.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 18+) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 18+) Planning Area: North

72.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (59.7%), North has a value of 72.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(59.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (72.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (74.0%).
Prior Value
(74.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 18+) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Dental Visit in the Past Year (Ages 18+) Planning Area: South

68.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (59.7%), South has a value of 68.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(59.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (68.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (64.3%).
Prior Value
(64.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

Kidney Disease

Value
Compared to:

Health / Other Conditions

Kidney Disease

Value
Compared to:

Kidney Disease County: Kane

Current Value:

Kidney Disease County: Kane

1.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (3.7%), Kane has a value of 1.7% which is lower and better.
IL Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Kane has a value of 1.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (1.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.4%).
Prior Value
(3.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Kidney Disease Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Kidney Disease Planning Area: Central

1.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Central has a value of 1.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (1.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.4%).
Prior Value
(2.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Kidney Disease Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Kidney Disease Planning Area: North

1.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), North has a value of 1.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (1.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.7%).
Prior Value
(4.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Kidney Disease Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Kidney Disease Planning Area: South

1.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), South has a value of 1.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (1.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.3%).
Prior Value
(2.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Other Conditions

Osteoporosis (Ages 50+)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Other Conditions

Osteoporosis (Ages 50+)

Value
Compared to:

Osteoporosis (Ages 50+) County: Kane

Current Value:

Osteoporosis (Ages 50+) County: Kane

7.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (9.4%), Kane has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (7.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Osteoporosis (Ages 50+) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Osteoporosis (Ages 50+) Planning Area: Central

8.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (9.4%), Central has a value of 8.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (8.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.5%).
Prior Value
(7.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Osteoporosis (Ages 50+) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Osteoporosis (Ages 50+) Planning Area: North

7.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (9.4%), North has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (7.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.8%).
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Osteoporosis (Ages 50+) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Osteoporosis (Ages 50+) Planning Area: South

7.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (9.4%), South has a value of 7.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (7.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

No Leisure-time Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

No Leisure-time Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

No Leisure-time Physical Activity County: Kane

Current Value:

No Leisure-time Physical Activity County: Kane

27.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (23.9%), Kane has a value of 27.7% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.2%), Kane has a value of 27.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (27.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (17.8%).
Prior Value
(17.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

No Leisure-time Physical Activity Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

No Leisure-time Physical Activity Planning Area: Central

16.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (26.2%), Central has a value of 16.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (16.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.9%).
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

No Leisure-time Physical Activity Planning Area: North

Current Value:

No Leisure-time Physical Activity Planning Area: North

30.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (26.2%), North has a value of 30.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (30.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (18.1%).
Prior Value
(18.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

No Leisure-time Physical Activity Planning Area: South

Current Value:

No Leisure-time Physical Activity Planning Area: South

28.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (26.2%), South has a value of 28.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (28.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (18.5%).
Prior Value
(18.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

COPD (Lung Disease)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

COPD (Lung Disease)

Value
Compared to:

COPD (Lung Disease) County: Kane

Current Value:

COPD (Lung Disease) County: Kane

8.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (6.2%), Kane has a value of 8.7% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.6%), Kane has a value of 8.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (8.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.5%).
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

COPD (Lung Disease) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

COPD (Lung Disease) Planning Area: Central

8.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.6%), Central has a value of 8.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (8.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.1%).
Prior Value
(9.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

COPD (Lung Disease) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

COPD (Lung Disease) Planning Area: North

8.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.6%), North has a value of 8.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (8.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.6%).
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

COPD (Lung Disease) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

COPD (Lung Disease) Planning Area: South

9.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.6%), South has a value of 9.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (9.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Currently Has Asthma (Ages 18+)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Currently Has Asthma (Ages 18+)

Value
Compared to:

Currently Has Asthma (Ages 18+) County: Kane

Current Value:

Currently Has Asthma (Ages 18+) County: Kane

8.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (8.9%), Kane has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
IL Value
(8.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.8%), Kane has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (8.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.1%).
Prior Value
(8.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Currently Has Asthma (Ages 18+) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Currently Has Asthma (Ages 18+) Planning Area: Central

8.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.8%), Central has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (8.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.8%).
Prior Value
(4.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Currently Has Asthma (Ages 18+) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Currently Has Asthma (Ages 18+) Planning Area: North

7.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.8%), North has a value of 7.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (7.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Currently Has Asthma (Ages 18+) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Currently Has Asthma (Ages 18+) Planning Area: South

8.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (9.4%), South has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.4% in 2014)
The U.S. value is taken from the 2013 PRC National Health Survey; the methodological approach for the national survey is identical to the approach for the 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment in Kane County.
Compared to the prior value, South (8.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.6%).
Prior Value
(9.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Current Smoker

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Current Smoker

Value
Compared to:

Current Smoker County: Kane

Current Value:

Current Smoker County: Kane

13.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (15.8%), Kane has a value of 13.7% which is lower and better.
IL Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Kane has a value of 13.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (13.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.6%).
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Current Smoker Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Current Smoker Planning Area: Central

8.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Central has a value of 8.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (8.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.4%).
Prior Value
(11.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Current Smoker Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Current Smoker Planning Area: North

11.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), North has a value of 11.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (11.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.6%).
Prior Value
(12.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Current Smoker Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Current Smoker Planning Area: South

17.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), South has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (17.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (15.7%).
Prior Value
(15.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Healthy Weight (BMI 18.5-24.9)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

Healthy Weight (BMI 18.5-24.9)

Value
Compared to:

Healthy Weight (BMI 18.5-24.9) County: Kane

Current Value:

Healthy Weight (BMI 18.5-24.9) County: Kane

29.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (32.9%), Kane has a value of 29.6% which is lower and worse.
IL Value
(32.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (30.3%), Kane has a value of 29.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(30.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (29.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (32.9%).
Prior Value
(32.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Healthy Weight (BMI 18.5-24.9) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Healthy Weight (BMI 18.5-24.9) Planning Area: Central

29.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (30.3%), Central has a value of 29.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(30.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (29.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (29.3%).
Prior Value
(29.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Healthy Weight (BMI 18.5-24.9) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Healthy Weight (BMI 18.5-24.9) Planning Area: North

28.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (30.3%), North has a value of 28.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(30.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (28.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (34.4%).
Prior Value
(34.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Healthy Weight (BMI 18.5-24.9) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Healthy Weight (BMI 18.5-24.9) Planning Area: South

30.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (30.3%), South has a value of 30.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(30.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (30.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (32.5%).
Prior Value
(32.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Weight Status

Obese (BMI 30+)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

Obese (BMI 30+)

Value
Compared to:

Obese (BMI 30+) County: Kane

Current Value:

Obese (BMI 30+) County: Kane

31.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (31.6%), Kane has a value of 31.9% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.8%), Kane has a value of 31.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (31.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.5%).
Prior Value
(28.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Obese (BMI 30+) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Obese (BMI 30+) Planning Area: Central

31.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (29.0%), Central has a value of 31.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(29.0% in 2014)
The U.S. value is taken from the 2013 PRC National Health Survey; the methodological approach for the national survey is identical to the approach for the 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment in Kane County.
Compared to the prior value, Central (31.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (24.5%).
Prior Value
(24.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Obese (BMI 30+) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Obese (BMI 30+) Planning Area: North

34.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (29.0%), North has a value of 34.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(29.0% in 2014)
The U.S. value is taken from the 2013 PRC National Health Survey; the methodological approach for the national survey is identical to the approach for the 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment in Kane County.
Compared to the prior value, North (34.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (25.1%).
Prior Value
(25.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Obese (BMI 30+) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Obese (BMI 30+) Planning Area: South

30.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (29.0%), South has a value of 30.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(29.0% in 2014)
The U.S. value is taken from the 2013 PRC National Health Survey; the methodological approach for the national survey is identical to the approach for the 2014 Community Health Needs Assessment in Kane County.
Compared to the prior value, South (30.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (34.5%).
Prior Value
(34.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Weight Status

Overweight (BMI 25+)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

Overweight (BMI 25+)

Value
Compared to:

Overweight (BMI 25+) County: Kane

Current Value:

Overweight (BMI 25+) County: Kane

67.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (65.0%), Kane has a value of 67.8% which is higher and worse.
IL Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (67.8%), Kane has a value of 67.8%.
US Value
(67.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (67.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (65.6%).
Prior Value
(65.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Overweight (BMI 25+) Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

Overweight (BMI 25+) Planning Area: Central

67.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (67.8%), Central has a value of 67.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(67.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (67.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (69.0%).
Prior Value
(69.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Overweight (BMI 25+) Planning Area: North

Current Value:

Overweight (BMI 25+) Planning Area: North

69.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (67.8%), North has a value of 69.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(67.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (69.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (63.6%).
Prior Value
(63.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Overweight (BMI 25+) Planning Area: South

Current Value:

Overweight (BMI 25+) Planning Area: South

66.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (67.8%), South has a value of 66.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(67.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (66.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.9%).
Prior Value
(66.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

"Fair/Poor" Physical Health

Value
Compared to:

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

"Fair/Poor" Physical Health

Value
Compared to:

"Fair/Poor" Physical Health County: Kane

Current Value:

"Fair/Poor" Physical Health County: Kane

14.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the IL Value (18.0%), Kane has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
IL Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Illinois State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Kane has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kane (14.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.7%).
Prior Value
(15.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

"Fair/Poor" Physical Health Planning Area: Central

Current Value:

"Fair/Poor" Physical Health Planning Area: Central

6.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Central has a value of 6.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Central (6.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.6%).
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

"Fair/Poor" Physical Health Planning Area: North

Current Value:

"Fair/Poor" Physical Health Planning Area: North

18.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), North has a value of 18.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North (18.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.9%).
Prior Value
(12.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

"Fair/Poor" Physical Health Planning Area: South

Current Value:

"Fair/Poor" Physical Health Planning Area: South

14.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), South has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South (14.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (22.0%).
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.